Zadorozhnaya Elena Anatolyevna arrest. The Moscow City Court left the head of the Belgorod district in custody

The detained director of a capital school, suspected of receiving 20 million rubles. the students' parents will be charged, and then investigators will petition the court to place him under arrest. Yulia Ivanova, senior assistant to the head of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee for the city of Moscow, reported this to Gazeta.Ru.

“He will be charged. He has been detained, tomorrow in court, most likely, a preventive measure will be chosen for him.”, Ivanova explained.

The day before, the Investigative Committee announced that a criminal case had been opened against the 59-year-old school director under Part 3 of Art. 285 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (abuse of official powers). Officially, the Investigative Committee does not report the school number and the name of the director. But two sources familiar with the situation told Gazeta.Ru that we are talking about school No. 1498 and its head Mikhail Gerchikov.

According to investigators, the director of a Moscow school located on Michurinsky Prospekt offered students’ parents to enter into agreements for additional classes English. However, the classes were actually paid for from the city budget. Over two years, more than 760 parents entered into these agreements, paying a total of more than 20 million rubles. In cash the director made the decisions at his own discretion, the Investigative Committee said in a statement.

The director of one of the Moscow schools is suspected of imposing English classes on parents for money, while in reality the children were taught by school teachers as part of the schedule at budget expense, reported “ Interfax" official representative of the Main Investigation Department of the Investigative Committee for Moscow, Yulia Ivanova.

"Investigative bodies of the Main Investigation Department of the RF IC in Moscow have opened a criminal case against the 59-year-old director of a state budgetary educational institution. He is suspected of committing a crime under Part 3 of Article 285 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (abuse of official powers)", - said Ivanova.

According to investigators, the director of the school, located on Michurinsky Prospekt, annually involved the parents of students in concluding agreements with the school under his control. commercial organization. The agreements provided for additional English classes.

From 2012 to 2014 academic years, additional classes took place with the involvement of the same teaching staff of the school at the time provided for by the curriculum, and were actually provided with funds allocated from the city budget. “More than 760 parents entered into these agreements; the total amount for the classes exceeded 20 million rubles. The director used the funds at his own discretion.”, - noted Ivanova.

According to her, the offense was discovered thanks to an inspection by the Moscow Department of Education.

Investigators are establishing the circumstances of the incident, a search was carried out at the director’s place of residence, as well as at the school, the director was detained, said a representative of the Investigative Committee.

A criminal case has been opened in Moscow against the director of one of the capital's schools. He is suspected under Part 3 of Art. . . . . .

As reported “ Rosbalt" in the press service of the Main Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for Moscow, the director of a Moscow school on Michurinsky Prospekt annually involved parents of students in concluding agreements between them and a commercial organization controlled by him. . . . . .

Currently, a set of investigative actions and operational-search measures are being carried out aimed at establishing all the circumstances of the incident. In addition, a search was carried out at the director's place of residence, as well as at the school. The school director has been detained.

Yesterday, the judge of the Moscow City Court, Marina Selina, dismissed the complaint against the arrest of the head of the Belgorod district administration, Anatoly Popkov. At the end of October, the Basmanny Court of Moscow granted the investigation's request and sent an official suspected of receiving a bribe to the capital's pre-trial detention center No. 5 (Part 6 of Article 290 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). Mr. Popkov, on the eve of his arrest, was detained by FSB operatives in the Belgorod region, and then taken to Moscow. His case is being handled by the central office of the Investigative Committee, where developer Pavel Tapashidi turned. He experienced administrative difficulties with the implementation of his projects in the Belgorod region. During the consideration of the complaint, Anatoly Popkov stated that he agreed to cooperate with the investigation, but did not intend to “denigrate or slander anyone.” The official’s lawyers told Kommersant-Chernozemye that the journalists were speaking “against an innocent man,” and also compared Mr. Popkov to Christ, whom people left defenseless on Calvary.

Even before the start of the hearing, Anatoly Popkov’s lawyers refused to give comments to Kommersant-Chernozemye and indicate the position of the defense. The ex-head of the Belgorod district was represented in court by Belgorod lawyer Mikhail Bazhinov and two Moscow lawyers - Svetlana Baturina and Vakhtang Fedorov. Before the consideration of the complaint began in the corridor of the Moscow City Court, Mr. Bazhinov told Kommersant-Chernozemye that he objects to the publicity of the trial, which, in his opinion, could harm his client: “His guilt has not been proven, and just as people did not defend Christ on Calvary, so will you are acting against an innocent person.”

Ms. Baturina noted that “journalists could come to the meeting only by order of the investigation.” However, representatives of the Prosecutor General’s Office and the investigation also refused to answer questions from Kommersant-Chernozemye.

At the beginning of the hearing, Svetlana Baturina asked the judge to close the process, since “media representatives are superfluous here.” Marina Selina was surprised by this petition, because “everyone can attend open meetings.” She asked Anatoly Popkov via video link whether he objected to the presence of the Kommersant-Chernozemye journalist at the meeting. “No, I don’t mind,” answered Mr. Popkov. He participated in the meeting via video link from pre-trial detention center No. 5 (Vodnik), the monitor showed an image of a man in a tracksuit behind bars. Mr. Popkov answered the judge’s questions confidently. True, he was tormented by a cough during the hearing, but when the judge asked him to interrupt the hearing, the official replied that he was fine and was ready to continue.

Mr. Popkov’s defenders brought to court his numerous awards, certifying that he is an honorary citizen of the Krasnogvardeisky district of the Belgorod region, a recipient of the gratitude of the President of the Russian Federation, awarded the medal of the Order of Merit for the Fatherland, II degree, awarded by Governor Evgeny Savchenko, and also received several letters of thanks from representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church. The lawyers asked the judge to change the measure of restraint to house arrest. They presented documents confirming the availability of housing in Moscow, which friends of his family are ready to provide to Mr. Popkov during the investigation. “Our client will be isolated in a Moscow apartment, his movements will be controlled, and his social circle will be limited,” explained Mr. Bazhinov.

In his opinion, Anatoly Popkov should not be in a pre-trial detention center also because he has health problems, including heart problems. “Pay attention to his cough, maybe the person already has tuberculosis. He grew up in greenhouse conditions, in the village,” added Mikhail Bazhinov. “We need to follow a humane path,” supported Mrs. Baturina. “Popkov is an absolutely socialized person, has no previous convictions, and he is supported by Belgorod society,” the defense insisted. “What happened to Anatoly Tikhonovich will be sorted out by the investigation and the court, but he should be under house arrest,” said Vakhtang Fedorov.

Mikhail Bazhinov also noted that earlier the investigation and the court violated Anatoly Popkov’s right to defense after his arrest. The lawyer said that in the protocol the time of Anatoly Popkov’s detention is indicated as October 18, 22.25, although “they were actually detained in his office at 15.20.” “My client was not explained his rights, and I was not allowed to see him at the Investigative Committee for about a day, and the Basmanny Court did not take this into account when deciding on the preventive measure,” argued Mr. Bazhinov. According to the lawyers, they still do not have the case materials, the testimony of witnesses, they do not have complete information on which the accusation is based.

Anatoly Popkov himself called his detention a “monstrous mistake.”

I am most interested in an objective investigation and want my good name to be cleared. I hope that the investigation and the court will sort it out and put an end to it.

I am ready to cooperate with the investigation within the framework of a constructive dialogue, but I will not say what they want to hear from me, but which did not happen. I will not slander or denigrate anyone. I worked on Belgorod soil for 25 years, my loved ones are buried here, my family is here. To escape is to confirm your guilt,” the official said. “I have nowhere to run. I have no real estate abroad, no bills, no funds to escape,” he added.

The investigator and the prosecutor did not agree with changing the preventive measure to house arrest, citing the fact that Mr. Popkov had a foreign passport. As a result, the judge rejected the defense’s complaint and left Anatoly Popkov in pretrial detention until at least December 19.

Increased media attention today was focused on the Preobrazhensky Court of Moscow, where the decision was announced in the case of the director of one of the capital’s schools. The prosecution asked that Yevgeny Shterengarts be sentenced to custody in the courtroom and actual imprisonment for an erroneously paid fine of 28 thousand rubles.

The penalty was imposed for violations committed by the previous director. Money for the payment was allocated from the school budget, but two years later it turned out that the new director had to pay from his own pocket. The judge eventually sentenced him to a new fine equal to seven times the previous one, but the defense insists on a full acquittal. A criminal conviction can cost a director his job.

The prosecutor demanded that Yevgeny Shterengarts be sent to a general regime colony for three years, but the judge decided otherwise. There will be no conclusion, a fine of 200 thousand rubles. The school director admitted that this sentence was a blow for him. He was found guilty of embezzlement of budget funds using his official position. In fact, having a criminal record, he will no longer be able to work at school.

“This doesn’t make it any easier for me. Because besides this profession, which I know and can do well, there is no other profession. Therefore, this will actually be a ban on the profession,” says Evgeniy Shterengarts.

The same fine was issued in 2013. When Evgeny Shterengarts barely headed school 1282. Even under the previous director, parents wrote a complaint to the prosecutor’s office about bad major renovation. And the inspectors came to check the new manager and issued acts of violations in his name. Shterenharz paid 28 thousand rubles from the school budget. As investigators and prosecutors later announced, he had to take the money from his own pocket. Shteregnarz himself assures that the law does not clearly state from what funds the fine must be paid. And before that, I consulted with the school lawyer.

True, these facts were not paid attention to for two years. OBEP investigators came to check only in March 2015. Shterenharz then immediately compensated for all the damage, but a criminal case was still opened. He was removed from office during the investigation. Today, when the director came to school to tell latest news from the courtroom, one of the teachers lost their nerve. The team is on the side of the leader.

“We were in shock and are still in shock. What else can we add? It seems to me that since the fine has already been paid, and paid twice, then this fine is not a reason, apparently, but a reason for dismissing the director. This is how I explain it to myself,” - says the teacher primary school GBU Secondary School No. 1282 Veronica Sokolkina.

“We are very upset, to be honest, because our working process has only just been established and launched. Let’s just say that we have all just gotten into working mode over these two years, set ourselves up for new way and for more productive work, naturally,” notes Ekaterina Petukhova, a teacher of Russian language and literature at State Budgetary Institution Secondary School No. 1282.

Lawyers are wondering why these facts did not come to light sooner. After all, the school is checked regularly. And the capital’s department of education was supposed to control all financial activities educational institution, including payment of fines.

“The Education Department is directly related to the plan of financial and economic activities and to all payments that the school makes. It checks, returns and gives the go-ahead for payment. But in this case this was not done, moreover, audit confirmed that there were no violations in the activities of the school for the entire year,” said Sofiko Mekvabishvili, a lawyer at State Budgetary Institution Secondary School No. 1282.

The capital's Department of Education refused to comment on the situation, as did the prosecutor's office of the Preobrazhensky district of Moscow. Meanwhile, Evgeniy Shterengarts’ lawyers found out that exactly the same cases happened in the Moscow region and Karelia. And the damage there was much greater. But in both cases, the school directors were acquitted.

"We, of course, do not have a judicial precedent in Russia, in contrast to the Anglo-Saxon system of law, but nevertheless, the unity judicial practice no one canceled. Because there is such an understanding as the correct interpretation of the law,” explains Evgeniy Shterengarts’ lawyer Evgeniy Korchago.

Evgeniy Shterengarts' lawyers now have 10 days to appeal the verdict. The teacher himself says that this is a lesson for life.

The school is about to expand. There will be several new buildings, many times more students. The budget will increase accordingly. Who will lead the updated educational institution, is still unclear.

On September 10, 2017, elections of deputies to the Council of Deputies of the Solntsevo Municipal District will take place. In these elections, the residents of Solntsevo need to get elected proactive citizens, which bring and will bring great benefit to the two districts. It is high time to put an end to the practice where United Russia, which has occupied municipal councils in Moscow, votes according to the orders of the government, meekly approves any decisions of officials and does not care at all about the real needs of the people. The people should decide, not officials! As a rule, directors and teachers of schools, chief doctors of clinics and hospitals are nominated. These are the busiest people who do not care about the problems of the districts, due to the specifics of their work, but are nominated for deputies to improve their status. Such people will definitely not deal with our problems.

Here is an example of the promises of deputies in the last elections, in fact, you voted for them

Have they done much of what they promised for you, for Solntsevo?

It seems that many have forgotten that power is not clerks from the council, not officials from the mayor’s office, not oligarchs from the government, but the people. The people are tired of the deafness of officials! People need a government that will hear them.

How long can it continue that today’s Council of Deputies of the Solntsevo Municipal District consists mainly of teachers and doctors? Solntsevo is stuck in the mud. The State Budgetary Institution “Zhilishchnik Solntsevo District” does not have the required amount of equipment for removing snow in winter. The cleaning of the city area is disgusting. Broken curbstones along the Solntsevo roads, no one is replacing them. There are no road markings on the roads. The bus stops are filthy and dirty. State Budgetary Institution "Zhilishchnik Solntsevo District" organized an unauthorized landfill and a household camp near an artificial skating rink (the intersection of roads along Aviatorov Street and Yuliana Semenov Street), a broken road from the street. Volynskaya to the designed passage 6595. It’s the 21st century, and in Solntsevo we don’t have outdoor lighting from the street. Aviatorov before moving to Proizvodstvennaya St., from the intersection of the roads of St. Aviatorov to the intersection with the road along the street. Yuliana Semenova. Many children's and sports grounds in the courtyards of our houses require replacement of playgrounds and floor coverings. And our “woe” deputies, consisting mainly of teachers and doctors, give good grade work of the State Budgetary Institution “Zhilischnik of the Solntsevo District”. Without delving into the problems of the districts, they vote to approve the budget of the Solntsevo municipal district for 2017 and planning period 2018 and 2019

Have you, residents of the Solntsevo municipal district, ever seen your deputies in the eyes? No. Have they reported to you on their work done? No.

We have nothing against teachers and doctors, but their calling is to teach children and treat sick patients.

Let's fill the gap. Here they are the current deputies of Solntsevo

DEPUTIES

	Aleshnikov Mikhail Natanovich, born in 1963. Place of residence: Moscow, Solntsevo district. Head of the section of SK Wisla LLC. Nominated by the electoral association Moscow City Branch political party"Communist Party Russian Federation", party member. Born in Magadan on February 12, 1963.
	Pidde Olga Vasilievna, born in 1950. Place of residence: Moscow, Fili-Davydkovo district. Chief physician of the city clinic No. 212 of the Moscow Department of Health. Deputy of the Municipal Assembly of the intracity municipality Solntsevo in Moscow from 2008 to 2012. Self-nomination. General practitioner and healthcare organizer of the highest category. Since 2000, he has been the chief freelance therapist of the Health Department of the UAB. Takes part in the implementation of the Healthcare Modernization program. Married, has an adult daughter.
	Popovich Viktor Konstantinovich, born in 1951. Place of residence: Moscow, Yasenevo district. Chief physician of city hospital No. 17 of the Moscow Department of Health. Deputy of the Municipal Assembly of the Solntsevo intra-city municipal formation in Moscow from 2008 to 2012. Self-nomination. Doctor of Medical Sciences. Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation. The National Academy of Public Recognition of Merits and Achievements of Citizens awarded the Order. Hippocrates with the title “Best medical worker Russia". Awarded certificate of honor Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia. Labor veteran.
	Vyaznikov Oleg Nikolaevich, born in 1978. Place of residence: Moscow, Solntsevo district. General manager LLC "Kors-Korsha" Self-nomination. Born and raised in the Solntsevo area. Graduated from the Russian Social University. Married, has two sons.
	Verkhovich Valery Stepanovich, born in 1964. Place of residence: Moscow, Solntsevo district. Self-nomination, member of the All-Russian Party "United Russia". Born in Odintsovo, Moscow region. Graduated from Moscow State Industrial University. Labor path started in 1982 at NPO Vzlyot. In 1982-1984. served in the Soviet army. In 1987 he was hired at SPTU-136. In 2000, he headed Avtogran LLC. Deputy of the Municipal Assembly of the Solntsevo intracity municipality in Moscow from 2008 to 2012.
	Maslennikova Irina Petrovna, born in 1961. Place of residence: Moscow, Solntsevo district. Director of the Center children's creativity"Solntsevo" Deputy of the Municipal Assembly of the Solntsevo intra-city municipal formation in Moscow from 2008 to 2012. Self-nomination. Higher professional education. He has been working in Solntsevo for more than 20 years. Married, has two daughters. Winner of the Moscow Grant competition. In 2005, he was awarded the title “Honorary Worker of Education of the Russian Federation.” She was awarded a diploma from the “Woman Director of the Year” competition held by the Moscow Government.
	Epishina Galina Nikolaevna, born in 1948. Place of residence: Moscow, Solntsevo district. Head of GBOU kindergarten No. 1880. Deputy of the Municipal Assembly of the Solntsevo intracity municipal formation in Moscow from 2008 to 2012. Self-nomination. Graduated from Moscow State Pedagogical University. Having started working as a teacher kindergarten No. 211 in Solntsevo, became the head of this kindergarten, and then took over the new building kindergarten No. 1880. She was awarded the badge “Excellence in Public Education.” Has the highest qualification category for the position of “manager”. Married, has an adult daughter.
	Zadorozhnaya Elena Anatolyevna, born in 1969. Place of residence: Moscow, Novo-Peredelkino district. Director of GOU Secondary School No. 1347. Self-nomination. She graduated with honors from the Pedagogical College and Moscow State Pedagogical University. Labor activity takes place in educational institutions Solntsevo district. She was awarded the “Excellence in Public Education” badge, a number of medals, a diploma from the Moscow Government in the framework of the sixth Moscow competition “Woman Director of the Year”, diplomas from the Moscow Department of Education, the Prefecture of the Closed Administrative District, and the Solntsevo District Administration. Married. Two children.
	Vlasov Dmitry Yurievich, born in 1970. Place of residence: Moscow, Troparevo-Nikulino district. Head of the Western water treatment station of the Moscow State Unitary Enterprise "Mosvodokanal". Deputy of the Municipal Assembly of the Solntsevo intra-city municipal formation in Moscow from 2008 to 2012. Self-nomination. Member of the All-Russian political party "United Russia". Married, has two daughters. Labor activity started as an electrician. Without interrupting his work, he graduated from the All-Union Institute of Civil Engineering. He has awards and the title “Honored Worker of the Housing and Communal Services of Russia.”
	Denisov Evgeniy Grigorievich, born in 1983. Place of residence: Moscow, Solntsevo district. Teacher of State Educational Institution Secondary School No. 1007. Self-nomination. Higher pedagogical education. Coaching and teaching experience for more than 11 years. Physical education teacher of the highest qualification category. Candidate for master of sports in football. Trainer at the Rainbow Center. Director of the Nadezhda sports club. Winner of district and city competitions various types sports Awarded a certificate from the Mayor of Moscow among best trainers and specialists in the field of physical education and sports working with children.
	Mustafina Svetlana Nikolaevna, born in 1964. Place of residence: Moscow, Solntsevo district. Head of Department No. 4 of the Main Directorate of the Pension Fund No. 2 for Moscow and the Moscow Region. Self-nomination. Born in Moscow. Higher education, graduated from the Faculty of Economics of the Moscow Aviation Institute. In 1983-1986. – technologist at the Research Institute of Precision Instruments. In 1986-1995 – patent engineer at JSC Stankolit. In 1996-2001 – chief specialist for the purpose of management pensions social protection population of the Prospekt Vernadskogo district. Since 2001 in various positions in Pension Fund RF.
	Sanitsky Denis Igorevich, born in 1990. Place of residence: Moscow, Solntsevo district. Student of the Russian Academy of Justice. Nominated by electoral association Regional office political party "Russian United Democratic Party "Yabloko" in Moscow." Awarded with certificates from the Office of the Department of Family and Family youth policy Moscow in ZAO for active work in youth public organizations on the territory of the district and prefecture of the Closed Administrative District of Moscow for active participation in the implementation of state youth policy.